Menu Close

Jail time for UK tech bosses if they fail to keep children safe online

The UK’s Online Safety Bill evades defeat in its third reading in Parliament after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak surrenders to rebellious MPs and promises to add two-year prison sentences for tech firm managers who fail to keep children safe online, reports the BBC. Communications watchdog Ofcom is expected to regulate the legislation.

Almost 50 MPs from Sunak’s Tory party, with support from opposition MPs, had been calling for the prison terms, and threatened to reject the long-languishing Bill. Sunak said he will ensure similar – tighter – proposals are written in.

Lead Tory rebel Miriam Cates said that including personal criminal liability is the only way to create change and has been implemented in the financial services and construction sectors.

Criminal action would be launched if a tech company ignored repeated warnings from Ofcom to protect children.

The Bill comes under the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, whose Secretary of State Michelle Donelan said the criminal element is based on a recently-passed law in Ireland. Donelan said in a statement that while the amendment would not affect “those who have acted in good faith to comply in a proportionate way, it gives the Act additional teeth to deliver change and ensure that people are held to account if they fail to properly protect children.”

The Bill has now passed through the House of Commons and will begin the next stage of its never-ending journey, in the House of Lords. Albeit with fresh amendments before it even passes down the corridor.

Time for age verification tech

The possibility of criminal proceedings against a named representative means any tech or software introduced by online businesses to keep children out or safe will need to be robust.

“I find it hard to envisage criminal proceedings relating to age assurance if online services are making use of good-quality verification and estimation technology, independently tested and certified to the latest international standards,” Iain Corby, executive director of the Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA) tells Biometric Update.

“Regulators will want to encourage that behaviour, and jailing executives who do the right thing does not create an incentive for compliance so is unlikely to pass a public interest test for bringing a prosecution if that is the only issue. But this amendment will inevitably still concentrate the minds of business leaders on online safety and give them a stronger argument when justifying the required investments.”

Age estimation and verification companies are ready to receive investment. The tech is also ready, according to Julie Dawson, chief policy and regulatory officer at UK-based digital identity firm Yoti. “There are now low-cost, scalable, privacy-preserving age verification solutions which can protect children from serious harm, and create safe, age-appropriate experiences.

“Yoti’s technology for age assurance is independently audited, working at scale globally, and can help companies comply with the proposed regulations,” Dawson adds. Her firm’s age estimation technology is already in use around the world for age checks for young Instagram users in certain circumstances.

“Businesses should be required to implement effective age verification and play their part in creating a safer online environment. Until this happens, children continue to be at risk every day.”

No smooth sailing, especially across English Channel

The legislation now passes to the upper chamber, the House of Lords. It is not expected to have a smooth journey.

“There should be no further delays to the Online Safety Bill because these solutions are ready now,” comments Yoti’s Dawson. “Individuals can just share the fact that they are over a certain age, and nothing else. This data minimisation approach protects the privacy of individuals, gives businesses confidence that someone is over the correct age, and prevents children from stumbling across explicit, harmful content.”

The amendments to the Bill drift somewhat into the absurd. Online activity is deemed to reflect crimes in the physical world. Illegal immigration gets its own section in Donelan’s statement, including “aiding, abetting, counselling, conspiring etc those offences by posting videos of people crossing the channel which show that activity in a positive light could be an offence that is committed online and therefore falls within what is priority illegal content.”

Tech companies such as social media would have to remove “positive” migrant boat crossing videos.

Meanwhile, research is suggesting that the internet might not be so bad for children overall. A study on Instagram direct messages in the Netherlands finds children may glean a lot more joy than sadness in their online activity, reports Fast Company.

Even Wikipedia has criticized the Bill as a volunteer-run site, saying it would “limit freedom,” reports the BBC. The UK’s Online Safety Bill evades defeat in its third reading in Parliament after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak surrenders to rebellious MPs and promises to add two-year prison sentences for tech firm managers who fail to keep children safe online, reports the BBC. Communications watchdog Ofcom is expected to regulate the legislation.

Almost 50 MPs from Sunak’s Tory party, with support from opposition MPs, had been calling for the prison terms, and threatened to reject the long-languishing Bill. Sunak said he will ensure similar – tighter – proposals are written in.

Lead Tory rebel Miriam Cates said that including personal criminal liability is the only way to create change and has been implemented in the financial services and construction sectors.

Criminal action would be launched if a tech company ignored repeated warnings from Ofcom to protect children.

The Bill comes under the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, whose Secretary of State Michelle Donelan said the criminal element is based on a recently-passed law in Ireland. Donelan said in a statement that while the amendment would not affect “those who have acted in good faith to comply in a proportionate way, it gives the Act additional teeth to deliver change and ensure that people are held to account if they fail to properly protect children.”

The Bill has now passed through the House of Commons and will begin the next stage of its never-ending journey, in the House of Lords. Albeit with fresh amendments before it even passes down the corridor.
Time for age verification tech
The possibility of criminal proceedings against a named representative means any tech or software introduced by online businesses to keep children out or safe will need to be robust.

“I find it hard to envisage criminal proceedings relating to age assurance if online services are making use of good-quality verification and estimation technology, independently tested and certified to the latest international standards,” Iain Corby, executive director of the Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA) tells Biometric Update.

“Regulators will want to encourage that behaviour, and jailing executives who do the right thing does not create an incentive for compliance so is unlikely to pass a public interest test for bringing a prosecution if that is the only issue. But this amendment will inevitably still concentrate the minds of business leaders on online safety and give them a stronger argument when justifying the required investments.”

Age estimation and verification companies are ready to receive investment. The tech is also ready, according to Julie Dawson, chief policy and regulatory officer at UK-based digital identity firm Yoti. “There are now low-cost, scalable, privacy-preserving age verification solutions which can protect children from serious harm, and create safe, age-appropriate experiences.

“Yoti’s technology for age assurance is independently audited, working at scale globally, and can help companies comply with the proposed regulations,” Dawson adds. Her firm’s age estimation technology is already in use around the world for age checks for young Instagram users in certain circumstances.

“Businesses should be required to implement effective age verification and play their part in creating a safer online environment. Until this happens, children continue to be at risk every day.”
No smooth sailing, especially across English Channel
The legislation now passes to the upper chamber, the House of Lords. It is not expected to have a smooth journey.

“There should be no further delays to the Online Safety Bill because these solutions are ready now,” comments Yoti’s Dawson. “Individuals can just share the fact that they are over a certain age, and nothing else. This data minimisation approach protects the privacy of individuals, gives businesses confidence that someone is over the correct age, and prevents children from stumbling across explicit, harmful content.”

The amendments to the Bill drift somewhat into the absurd. Online activity is deemed to reflect crimes in the physical world. Illegal immigration gets its own section in Donelan’s statement, including “aiding, abetting, counselling, conspiring etc those offences by posting videos of people crossing the channel which show that activity in a positive light could be an offence that is committed online and therefore falls within what is priority illegal content.”

Tech companies such as social media would have to remove “positive” migrant boat crossing videos.

Meanwhile, research is suggesting that the internet might not be so bad for children overall. A study on Instagram direct messages in the Netherlands finds children may glean a lot more joy than sadness in their online activity, reports Fast Company.

Even Wikipedia has criticized the Bill as a volunteer-run site, saying it would “limit freedom,” reports the BBC.  Read More   

Generated by Feedzy

Disclaimer

Innov8 is owned and operated by Rolling Rock Ventures. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Any information obtained from this website should be reviewed with appropriate parties if there is any concern about the details reported herein. Innov8 is not responsible for its contents, accuracies, and any inaccuracies. Nothing on this site should be construed as professional advice for any individual or situation. This website includes information and content from external sites that is attributed accordingly and is not the intellectual property of Innov8. All feeds ("RSS Feed") and/or their contents contain material which is derived in whole or in part from material supplied by third parties and is protected by national and international copyright and trademark laws. The Site processes all information automatically using automated software without any human intervention or screening. Therefore, the Site is not responsible for any (part) of this content. The copyright of the feeds', including pictures and graphics, and its content belongs to its author or publisher.  Views and statements expressed in the content do not necessarily reflect those of Innov8 or its staff. Care and due diligence has been taken to maintain the accuracy of the information provided on this website. However, neither Innov8 nor the owners, attorneys, management, editorial team or any writers or employees are responsible for its content, errors or any consequences arising from use of the information provided on this website. The Site may modify, suspend, or discontinue any aspect of the RSS Feed at any time, including, without limitation, the availability of any Site content.  The User agrees that all RSS Feeds and news articles are for personal use only and that the User may not resell, lease, license, assign, redistribute or otherwise transfer any portion of the RSS Feed without attribution to the Site and to its originating author. The Site does not represent or warrant that every action taken with regard to your account and related activities in connection with the RSS Feed, including, without limitation, the Site Content, will be lawful in any particular jurisdiction. It is incumbent upon the user to know the laws that pertain to you in your jurisdiction and act lawfully at all times when using the RSS Feed, including, without limitation, the Site Content.  

Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami