Menu Close

Mitek’s second shot at avoiding BIPA class action rejected

Enterprise ID verifier Mitek is running out of exits before it approaches the Biometric Information Protection Act toll plaza.

A United States appeals court this week unanimously told Mitek it could not avoid being sued under the state of Illinois’ BIPA statutes by hiding behind an arbitration agreement.

Mitek provides facial recognition service for car renter HyreCar. It is accused of violating BIPA by not getting the express consent of state residents to capture biometric identifiers like face photos.

Named plaintiff Joshua Johnson claims to have uploaded a photo of his driver’s license and a selfie to be verified for HyreCar, the Cook County Record reports. From this initial check, a biometric template was stored for future identity verification, according to the complaint.

The chance that it could lose a class-action BIPA lawsuit and have to pay a significant amount of money prompted the company’s attorney to claim HyreCar’s mandatory arbitration contract clause covers Mitek, too.

A U.S. District Court judge had tossed that idea out and, now, so has a three-judge panel in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The problem with the defense is that the contract, part of which requires customers to settle disputes with the company through arbitration, is only between HyreCar and the renter.

HyreCar is not named in the proposed class action. Enterprise ID verifier Mitek is running out of exits before it approaches the Biometric Information Protection Act toll plaza.

A United States appeals court this week unanimously told Mitek it could not avoid being sued under the state of Illinois’ BIPA statutes by hiding behind an arbitration agreement.

Mitek provides facial recognition service for car renter HyreCar. It is accused of violating BIPA by not getting the express consent of state residents to capture biometric identifiers like face photos.

Named plaintiff Joshua Johnson claims to have uploaded a photo of his driver’s license and a selfie to be verified for HyreCar, the Cook County Record reports. From this initial check, a biometric template was stored for future identity verification, according to the complaint.

The chance that it could lose a class-action BIPA lawsuit and have to pay a significant amount of money prompted the company’s attorney to claim HyreCar’s mandatory arbitration contract clause covers Mitek, too.

A U.S. District Court judge had tossed that idea out and, now, so has a three-judge panel in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The problem with the defense is that the contract, part of which requires customers to settle disputes with the company through arbitration, is only between HyreCar and the renter.

HyreCar is not named in the proposed class action.  Read More  Biometric Update 

Generated by Feedzy

Disclaimer

Innov8 is owned and operated by Rolling Rock Ventures. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Any information obtained from this website should be reviewed with appropriate parties if there is any concern about the details reported herein. Innov8 is not responsible for its contents, accuracies, and any inaccuracies. Nothing on this site should be construed as professional advice for any individual or situation. This website includes information and content from external sites that is attributed accordingly and is not the intellectual property of Innov8. All feeds ("RSS Feed") and/or their contents contain material which is derived in whole or in part from material supplied by third parties and is protected by national and international copyright and trademark laws. The Site processes all information automatically using automated software without any human intervention or screening. Therefore, the Site is not responsible for any (part) of this content. The copyright of the feeds', including pictures and graphics, and its content belongs to its author or publisher.  Views and statements expressed in the content do not necessarily reflect those of Innov8 or its staff. Care and due diligence has been taken to maintain the accuracy of the information provided on this website. However, neither Innov8 nor the owners, attorneys, management, editorial team or any writers or employees are responsible for its content, errors or any consequences arising from use of the information provided on this website. The Site may modify, suspend, or discontinue any aspect of the RSS Feed at any time, including, without limitation, the availability of any Site content.  The User agrees that all RSS Feeds and news articles are for personal use only and that the User may not resell, lease, license, assign, redistribute or otherwise transfer any portion of the RSS Feed without attribution to the Site and to its originating author. The Site does not represent or warrant that every action taken with regard to your account and related activities in connection with the RSS Feed, including, without limitation, the Site Content, will be lawful in any particular jurisdiction. It is incumbent upon the user to know the laws that pertain to you in your jurisdiction and act lawfully at all times when using the RSS Feed, including, without limitation, the Site Content.  

Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami